• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is a legitimate concern, but I also question Mexico’s ability to adhere to those standards and administer justice correctly when El Chapo managed to give them the slip twice, even while under “maximum security”.

    People suspect that this argument is not being made by Mexican authorities in good faith, and it is easy to understand why people think that.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      It doesn’t matter if the argument is in good faith, or not. The issue is either nations abide by rule of law, and adjust as necessary, or not. For example, torture being reclassified under GW Bush administration as “enhanced interrogation.” By any good faith reasoning, it was torture, but the AG Yoo authorized it, so technically by the USA, it was within legal limits.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        America doing something wrong doesn’t mean it’s okay for other countries to do that thing as well.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          No one said it does; it was an example to illustrate the point, which seems was lost.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      So Mexican authorities should stop enforcing the law?

      Do you think that in order to deliver him to the US he didn’t commit multiple crimes? Should Mexico grant him amnesty?