• jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I feel like if there are people shooting up in your schoolyard, then you really need a SCS within 200m.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      The whole point is to move them somewhere safe to consume, for both the users and the public. Drugs can be pretty bad and make people do some bad things, from crimes to indecency. We dont need people fighting each other near schools, we dont need people relieving themselves in bushes near schools.

      • Girru00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        Did they not initially choose the sites near where there were the most problems. Like they said, if there are users doing it around the school, would you want to build a site there and have it contained, or build a site 2km away that doesnt reduce users near the school as much?

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          The difference between 200m and 2km is 10x. 200m feels very close, closer than many places will even place their bus stops to each other. Something along the lines of 500m-1km away from schools seems more reasonable IMO.

          Drug users loiter and use drugs where they can get away with it. With proper resources provided elsewhere many will go there instead of shooting up in the school yard, the ones that linger and become problematic can be relocated to treatment sites by law enforcement and site staff.