All of these organizations: https://ohrn.org/meet-our-networks/
Some are publicly owned, most aren’t, none of them are provincial.
if the choice is between having the safe consumption site close to your kids’ school and having people doing their drugs in the open near your kids’ school and leaving their used needles lying on the playground, which are you going to pick?
SCS
Often, these places are where they are because that’s where their clients already are.
Are they? Or is it just close enough the areas where underfunded volunteer organisations are able to get a physical site.
You may also want to measure out the radius of 200m from every school or daycare in your town or city on a map and see how many places are left where they can park SCSs.
This is neighborhood dependant. Somewhere like Sud-ouest in Montréal? Impossible. Somewhere like a Kingston suburb, a lot of real estate.
But that’s a great point, allow me to rephrase, the SCS sites should be an appropriate safe distance from schools; what that distance is is going to vary greatly between neighborhoods and their densities; and even the day trip programming of these schools (as an example if daycare always does their walks north to a canal which has playgrounds, then a SCS any distance along that route isn’t great, but a site to the south could be super close.
Figuring out where they’ll do more good than harm is more important than enforcing arbitrary limits.
Agreed, but this needs to be looked at holistically, not solely for the clients. That requires understanding the communities these sites are going into, and funding sites appropriately so selection isn’t based on funding.
Note that the government isn’t talking about moving SCSs outside of their arbitrary 200m zone from schools, they’ve simply announced their outright closure.
This is the crux. I don’t really want a safe consumption site near my kids’ school or daycare. I even think 200m is probably insufficient for a distance from a school or daycare. (I don’t know what the actual distance should be, 200m just feels insufficient)
But I also want SCSs. Literally just move them. The infrastructure demand is not that intense.
Nope, America is the pants and Alaska is the hat.
America is Canada’s pants AND hat.
Every day at the planetarium is definately weed day.
Lazy teens don’t want to spend 40+ hours in the field then walk uphill both ways to school.
Reduced staff? Sure. Entire? No.
We have ambassadorial staff in Ukraine, and it’s a very hot mess. Work doesn’t stop just because a war is on.
We used to put the reduced staff in a nearby nation. Not sure if that’s still necessary with improved telecoms, we can probably pull them all the way home.
that *end users are totally allowed to remove
Que every muppet ever that keeps saying “OMG, it’s illegal for me to remove a mattress tag” when it’s absolutely not, and they’d know that if they ever read the fucking mattress tag.
Also the wealth hording.