That’s hardly a reason to get rid of it or replace it. Clearly people are benefitting from it and it’s evident if you look at your tax return. If anything, the fact that people don’t know about the return is a failure in marketing. So sure, there are maybe some improvements to make.

But really, no matter what carbon scheme you put in place, the cons will find a way to complain about it. That’s not a failure of the carbon tax. That’s just how the conservatives operate.

I’d love to see the logic of the cons trying to explain why a foreign agency is spending so much effort to promote their candidate. Clearly Putin is a true Canadian patriot.

Opt in to each lesson!!?? So intentionally making it overly complicated and a burden on both teachers and parents.

It seems if you’re wealthy enough your wealth gets to enjoy a nice racheting effect.

I was being a bit facetious in the wake of Rogers being allowed to buy Shaw.

Of course they should be breaking up the large companies when there’s not much competition, but I doubt they’ll do much of anything.

And then they’ll probably just have Air Canada buy WestJet so they can deliver better value or some shit. That seems to be the way competition goes now.