• uberfreeza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look, I don’t agree with the rest of the statement either, but tell me, what is the water touching? Oh, more water? Water is wet.

    • CTDummy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It threw me at first too. Helps to think of it as wetness being an interaction between a liquid and solid. Water makes things wet, it isn’t itself wet.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        wet containing moisture or volatile components

        Water is wet. The fact that this is an argument is ridiculous.

        • finley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This describes very specifically how water makes other things wet. Nowhere, does it describe water making itself wet, because it can’t. Wetness is a property that water can only give to other things, not to itself.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            moisture wetness caused by water

            water is wet. water contains moisture, because water is moisture.

            Or you can go the chemical route, which is so eloquently put by Professor Richard Saykally:

            they’d say, “Strong tetrahedral hydrogen bonding!” But that’s the correct answer. That’s what makes water wet.

            https://gizmodo.com/what-makes-water-wet-1713082349

            Or if you’re more into videos you can watch an entire lecture on it. https://vimeo.com/11854837

            Because water is fucking wet.